Felix Livshitz
RT
An explosive court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission – a court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the “9/11” terrorist attacks on New York – has seemingly confirmed the unthinkable.
The document was originally published via a Guantanamo Bay court docket, but while public, it was completely redacted. Independent researchers obtained an unexpurgated copy. It is an account by the Commission’s lead investigator, DEA veteran Don Canestraro, of his personal probe of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers.
Two of the hijackers were being closely monitored by the CIA and may, wittingly or not, have been recruited by Langley long before they flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
The story of two men
Of the great many enduring mysteries of the 9/11 attacks still unresolved over two decades later, perhaps the biggest and gravest relate to the activities of Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar in the 18 months leading up to that fateful day. The pair traveled to the US on multi-entry visas in January 2000, despite having repeatedly been flagged by the CIA and NSA previously as likely Al Qaeda terrorists.
Mere days before their arrival, they attended an Al Qaeda summit in Kuala Lumpur, during which key details of the 9/11 attacks are likely to have been discussed and agreed. The meeting was secretly photographed and videotaped by Malaysian authorities at the direct request of the CIA’s Alec Station, a special unit set up to track Osama bin Laden, although oddly, no audio was captured.
Still, this background should’ve been sufficient to prevent Hazmi and Midhar from entering the US – or at least enough for the FBI to be informed of their presence in the country. As it was, they were admitted for a six-month period at Los Angeles International airport without incident, and Bureau representatives within Alec Station were blocked from sharing this information with their superiors by the CIA.
“We’ve got to tell the Bureau about this. These guys clearly are bad. One of them, at least, has a multiple-entry visa to the US. We’ve got to tell the FBI,” Mark Rossini, a member of Alec Station, has recalled discussing with his colleagues. “[But the CIA] said to me, ‘No, it’s not the FBI’s case, not the FBI’s jurisdiction.’”
(L) Nawaf al-Hazmi; (R) Khalid al-Mihdhar © Wikipedia
Immediately upon arrival, Hazmi and Midhar encountered a Saudi national residing in California named Omar al-Bayoumi in an airport restaurant. Over the next two weeks, he helped them find an apartment in San Diego, co-signed their lease, gave them $1,500 towards their rent, and introduced them to Anwar al-Awlaki, an imam at a local mosque. Al-Awlaki was killed in a US drone strike in Yemen in 2011.
In the wake of 9/11, Bayoumi unsurprisingly became a subject of interest in an FBI probe of potential Saudi involvement in the attacks, known as Operation Encore. In a 2003 interview with investigators in Riyadh, he claimed his meeting with Hazmi and Midhar was a coincidence – he heard them speaking Arabic, realized they couldn’t speak English, and decided to assist them out of charity.
The Bureau reached a very different conclusion – Bayoumi was a Saudi intelligence operative and part of a wider militant Wahhabist network in the US, which handled a myriad of potential and actual terrorists, and monitored the activities of anti-Riyadh dissidents abroad. What’s more, Encore judged there to be a 50/50 chance he had advanced knowledge of the 9/11 attacks before they happened, and so did the Saudi government.
Why was it hidden?
Those bombshell facts remained hidden from public view until March 2022, when a trove of FBI documents was declassified at the request of the White House. The newly released Guantanamo Military Commission filing sheds even further light on Bayoumi’s contact with Hazmi and Midhar – and in turn, the CIA’s keen interest in them, their activities throughout their stay in the US, and refusal to disclose their presence to the FBI until late August 2001.
The filing is an account by the Commission’s lead investigator, DEA veteran Don Canestraro, of his personal probe of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers. Based on a review of classified information held by, and interviews with representatives of, the FBI and Pentagon, the content strongly suggests that the CIA obstructed official investigations to conceal its penetration of Al Qaeda.
That’s the judgment of four separate, unnamed FBI agents interviewed by Canestraro who worked on investigations into the 9/11 attacks. The most incendiary charges were leveled by a Bureau agent referred to in his report as ‘CS-23’, who had “extensive knowledge of counterterrorism and counterintelligence matters.”
CS-23 recounted how the CIA repeatedly lied and stonewalled the FBI in its investigations into Bayoumi. For example, while Agency officials claimed to possess no files on him when asked by Operation Encore representatives, CS-23 knew for a fact this was a “falsehood,” and the CIA maintained several operational files on Bayoumi, amounting to an extensive paper trail.
Furthermore, CS-23 was certain that the CIA used its liaison relationship with the Saudi intelligence services to attempt to recruit Hazmi and Midhar, and circumvent laws prohibiting the Agency from conducting spying operations on US soil, by using Riyadh as a go between.
This account was backed up by another FBI investigator, ‘CS-3,’ who further claims that Bayoumi setting up bank accounts and renting an apartment for the two hijackers in San Diego “was done at the behest of the CIA.” Any information provided to Bayoumi would then be fed back to Alec Station.
[…]
Via https://www.rt.com/news/574490-cia-dirty-deeds-nine-eleven/
I agree. Skeptical. In my opinion, there's no convincing evidence anywhere that the planes actually existed. The hijackers were simply part of the cover story the FBI concocted with names (of Arab CIA assets) the CIA gave them. At least 2 of the alleged hijackers are still alive.
It goes without saying that any alleged terrorists were agents. But virtually everything put forward for 9/11 is a kind of distraction propaganda - including the focus on controlled demolition. Yes, even the very clear truth of the seeming "smoking gun" of WTC-7's perfect implosion is distraction propaganda. Well, who SHOWCASED its graceful sinking in 6.5 seconds from seven vantage points? It weren't no innocent bystanders, that's for sure, it was those in the employ of the propaganda strategists. WTC-7 was a decoy, a Trojan horse. Love the way they push it right in our faces.
https://youtu.be/Vgx8Uwo-Vxc
As George Orwell says, "All propaganda is lies even when one is telling the truth."
This quote and this quote from British psychiatrist, Anthony Daniels, are two of the most important quotes about propaganda, especially in relation to 9/11.
"The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control."
Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/124952-political-correctness-is-communist-propaganda-writ-small-in-my-study
The other most important phenomenon to recognise in relation to propaganda is this:
Those in power understand and rely with 100% confidence on the limitless elasticity of the Emperor's New Clothes effect. They didn't need WTC-7 for their terror story and they didn't need to bring it down on 9/11, they could have easily brought it down later with all the other damaged buildings they eventually destroyed. Its showcased collapse on 9/11 was very, very deliberate - it was to distract away from the true nature of 9/11.
9/11 wasn't an inside job per se, along with the destruction of the WTC, it was a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise comprising numerous smaller drills many of which they informed us of ... with a crucial few they didn't. All the buildings were evacuated - no deaths reported in 4, 5, 6 or 7, for example, only in 1, 2 and 3. How did no one die in 4, 5, 6 or 7 when 4. 5 and 6 were seemingly massively damaged at the time of the destructions? They had been evacuated. So are we to believe that professionals were hired to selectively evacuate buildings? No, you can propagandise health professionals to inject people with dangerous substances using over 100 years of fraudulent science but you can't propagandise demolition professionals to selectively evacuate buildings. Besides, they didn't want to kill and injure people on 9/11, they only wanted us to believe in their deaths. And here's another important truth:
In psyops they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
I don't know why anyone would doubt that being part of the MO of psyops.
Clearly, they WANT to kill people with the jab, that is not a "collateral damage" situation ... and they wanted to kill people with the hospital protocols too.
This shows the evidence for my hypothesis clearly:
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of