Repeated COVID Shots Driving Dangerous Variants, Turbo Cancers
By Rob Verkerk Ph.D.
According to vaccinologist Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, Ph.D., continued mass COVID-19 vaccination is driving more infectious and potentially dangerous viral variants, increasing the risk of severe COVID-19, aggressive cancers and autoimmune diseases in vaccinated populations.
Pointed or pointless?
The public is understandably confused. On the one hand, major scientific journals, news outlets and authorities have used, and continue to use, superlatives to describe COVID-19 genetic vaccines.
The journal Science called the results of a Moderna trial “absolutely remarkable,” The Washington Post referred to them as “an extraordinary success story,” BuzzFeed claimed the vaccines “work way better than we had ever expected,” while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.K. National Health Service and other authorities continue to cite the mantra used for all approved vaccines, referring them as “safe and effective” (here and here, respectively).
Conflicting information about an uncertain and unpredictable interaction
Yet, on the other hand, the scientific literature is increasingly awash with articles that suggest something quite different.
The CDC is still telling U.S. citizens to “stay up to date” with their shots, yet a preprint study released in June shows that Cleveland Clinic staff who weren’t “up-to-date” with their COVID-19 shots fared better against COVID-19 than those who were.
As early as 2021, as indicated in an article in Nature Medicine, “viral variants began to stack up” only after the vaccines were rolled out.
An article published in Frontiers in Immunology in early 2022 details the multiple immune escape strategies used by the virus both following infection and vaccination.
Then there are people’s individual experiences, with many who have been heavily vaccinated not experiencing good outcomes, either in relation to COVID-19 disease, a concern noted in the recently published Cleveland Clinic study — but also in relation to other diseases or conditions, cancer and autoimmune diseases included.
Emergency over — or not?
For most people, the COVID-19 crisis is over. That’s largely a consequence of the World Health Organization’s declaration in May this year that the “public health emergency” was no longer.
There are at least two reasons it is likely wrong to think that the COVID-19 drama is behind us.
The first is that the virus is still very much out there, circulating to its non-existent heart’s content. While it remains at large, it is susceptible to natural selection of immune escape variants.
Secondly, it seems authorities have no inclination to sideline COVID-19 shots. By contrast, they want to keep using them, and no doubt will use any obvious waves of COVID-19 disease as we progress towards the northern winter to justify more vaccination.
There is no shortage of acclaimed “experts” who can confirm for you that SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t transitioned to an endemic, seasonal pattern, as naturally occurring respiratory viruses typically do after the pandemic phase.
It’s still very much around as you may have noticed in your own circles — it’s just not being surveilled with the same intensity via COVID-19 testing stations dotted around each and almost every industrialized country.
[…]
Conflicting information doesn’t just create confusion. It creates cognitive dissonance. That’s an uncomfortable and unsettling feeling — and it drives people to find, and latch onto, what feels to them like a coherent, trusted view.
This causes division. Some still have trust in the authorities and the scientific establishment that remain steadfastly on the “vaccines-are-our-best-fix” podium. Others of us cannot support this view, seeing it as incoherent, both scientifically and experientially.
Many of us have lost trust in the scientific establishment, full stop. See here and here for our reasons why.
Any trust that we might have had prior to the COVID-19 crisis has since evaporated, largely because of the way the crisis and information relating to it was handled. That includes the mass censorship of dissenting scientific views.
[…]
Geert Vanden Bossche — dedicated to better understanding the uncertainty
It is in this vein that I get to the main purpose of the present piece. It is to introduce you to a new article by a person who has been something of an icon for many of us who have been attempting to grapple with the complexity of our immune systems’ dance with the ever-changing SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Changes that have been undoubtedly amplified greatly by the global COVID-19 vaccine program.
The person to whom I refer is of course immunologist and vaccinologist, Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, Ph.D., a person I admire greatly both for his scientific rigor and his resolve, but also for his bravery in the face of the monolith we might refer to as the scientific-medical-industrial complex. I am also humbled to regard Vanden Bossche as both an ally and a friend.
[…]
Download Vanden Bossche’s latest report, “Immunological correlates of vaccine breakthrough infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants in highly C-19 vaccinated populations.”
[…]
In a nutshell
In his article, Vanden Bossche sends a stark warning to those contemplating more COVID-19 shots later this year, as we proceed towards the northern hemisphere winter.
He explains in great detail how and why highly COVID-19-vaccinated populations will:
Serve to drive ever more infectious and potentially dangerous, immune escape, Omicron-derived variants.
Be at greater risk of severe COVID-19 than less vaccinated or unvaccinated populations.
How the risk of other conditions among highly vaccinated populations, including aggressive, early-onset, “turbo” cancers and autoimmune flare-ups, will likely increase significantly compared with those who choose to avoid further COVID-19 vaccination.
The evidence base pointing in this direction is becoming ever stronger (with many references being made to other literature in Vanden Bossche’s report).
[…]
Knowing what we already know, it is a travesty that such large swathes of the public still have confidence in COVID-19 vaccines, the vehemence of this position in the public’s mind reflecting the power of the machine driving the agenda.
In the simplest terms I can muster, this is what Vanden Bossche is suggesting is going on, including the elements that are a well-known part of the immune cascade that occurs following infection or vaccination.
What Vanden Bossche argues is that if you keep vaccinating large cohorts of people while the mutation-prone virus continues to circulate (i.e. during a pandemic), the cascade of events moves in a different direction to that which occurs with natural infection from a virus that enters via the respiratory system.
[…]
What has been revealed without any doubt over the last couple of years is that these all-important neutralizing antibodies don’t work effectively within the context of an immune escape pandemic.
That’s been especially the case since the Omicron variant evolved, itself being a response to the extreme immune selection pressure from mass vaccination.
The hope had been that when a vaccinated person becomes infected with the real virus, these neutralizing antibodies would bind primarily to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) displayed at the end of the coronavirus spikes around the surface of the virus.
These, in turn, block the ability of the virus to dock with ACE2 receptors even when the RBDs are in their primed, “open” position, and it is the ACE2 receptors on the epithelial cells of our bodies; these receptors provide the doorways that allow these viruses into our bodies, assuming they haven’t been blocked by the neutralizing antibodies.
But, in the case of large parts of the population being vaccinated while being exposed to the virus, these neutralizing antibodies do the job imperfectly because their affinity and/or titers (or: concentration in the blood) are still too low when they encounter the virus.
[…]
Ongoing large-scale vaccine breakthrough infections due to more infectious Omicron descendants then place continuous immune selection pressure on circulating viruses that continue to try and work around the body’s defenses.
The lack of sterilizing immunity coupled with the immune selection pressure towards newly emerging immune escape variants means that a cycle is set up in highly vaccinated populations that have no mechanism to dampen out circulating infection.
More and new breakthrough variants are created, and the cycle goes on and on, with no development of true herd immunity.
This loop is something that wouldn’t have occurred if populations had not been massively vaccinated during this pandemic.
mRNA vaccines are only expediting immune escape as they promote immune refocusing (refer to Vanden Bossche’s book, “The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic,” published February 2023).
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/geert-vanden-bossche-covid-vaccine-cancer/