By Rair Foundation USA
In the United States, dozens of food processing plants suspiciously caught fire over the past year. Remarkably, no one was present at the time of the fires. The Eco Health Alliance whistleblower, bioterrorism expert, military veteran, and scientist Dr. Andrew Huff has a possible explanation for the food supply fires.
Huff has access to government information about simulating a food supply attack. The information comes from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Food and Agriculture Sector Criticality Assessment Tool (FASCAT). This also includes which places are particularly at risk.
According to Huff, who authorities have harassed due to the nature of his work since 2019, the U.S. government coordinated the attacks on the food facilities. But, in addition, something remarkable happened: the hard disk with the FASCAT data disappeared.
Since then, there have been about 200 food factory attacks around the world, most of them in the U.S., he explained.
Huff had another backup and analyzed the attacks. It turned out that the attacks exactly matched the most critical systems in his data set. He reported this to the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI but never received a response.
Huff knows that the FBI and the food industry have tried to investigate what he calls “terrorist attacks,” but they’re getting nowhere. He suspects that a government-funded actor or a globalist group like the World Economic Forum is behind it.
Watch Dr. Andrew Huff’s interview with journalist Emerald Robinson:
https://rumble.com/v25rvlq-whistleblower-reveals-what-is-behind-the-mass-attacks-on-us-food-facilities.html
We in New Zealand are very conscious of the elite effort to deliberately destroy the food supply. As we are a long way from everywhere, we are usually the first to be affected by supply chain hiccups. In our community, we are busily turning our yards over to veggie gardens and chickens as well as launching community gardens.
Thanks for posting this.
The 18,000 cows burning to death in Texas were suspicious as all get out as well. Remember at first no one supposedly tried to interview any of the workers to find out what happened - there wasn't even a note in the stories that no one could be reached for comment. Then a month or two after the fact (when the workers could get their story straight) the story is put forth that a piece of equipment malfunctioned.
Now 18,000 head of cattle represent about a $40 million loss. They are going to have a decent amount of fire fighting equipment in there. There should also have been quite a bit of equipment to allow cows to be released in case of emergency. Also, with 18,000 cows, how many people would have been working there? A ratio of 100 cows to one worker would give 180 workers, and I think even that would be pushing it, but then I'm a city slicker and I don't know much about large scale dairy producers.
The story that the cows were in a holding area waiting to be milked stinks. With 18,000 cows, there just about would have to be a LOT of milking areas, and the cows would be constantly cycling in and out, wouldn't they?